4.6 Article

RESOLVING VEGA AND THE INCLINATION CONTROVERSY WITH CHARA/MIRC

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 761, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/761/1/L3

关键词

infrared: stars; stars: individual (Vega); stars: rotation; techniques: interferometric

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [AST-1211929, AST-0352723, AST-0707927, AST-1108963]
  2. Georgia State University
  3. University of Michigan
  4. NASA [NNH09AK731]
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J001651/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1211929] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1108963] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. STFC [ST/J001651/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optical and infrared interferometers definitively established that the photometric standard Vega (= alpha Lyrae) is a rapidly rotating star viewed nearly pole-on. Recent independent spectroscopic analyses could not reconcile the inferred inclination angle with the observed line profiles, preferring a larger inclination. In order to resolve this controversy, we observed Vega using the six-beam Michigan Infrared Combiner on the Center for High Angular Resolution Astronomy Array. With our greater angular resolution and dense (u, v)-coverage, we find that Vega is rotating less rapidly and with a smaller gravity darkening coefficient than previous interferometric results. Our models are compatible with low photospheric macroturbulence and are also consistent with the possible rotational period of similar to 0.71 days recently reported based on magnetic field observations. Our updated evolutionary analysis explicitly incorporates rapid rotation, finding Vega to have a mass of 2.15(-0.15) (+0.10) M-circle dot and an age 700(+150) (-75) Myr, substantially older than previous estimates with errors dominated by lingering metallicity uncertainties (Z = 0.006(-0.002) (+ 0.003)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据