4.8 Article

Severe block in processing of proinsulin to insulin accompanied by elevation of des-64,65 proinsulin intermediates in islets of mice lacking prohormone convertase-1/3

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.162352799

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK20595, P30 DK020595, P60 DK020595, R01 DK013914, DK13914] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neuroendocrine processing endoproteases PC2 and PC1/3 are expressed in the beta cells of the islets of Langerhans and participate in the processing of proinsulin to insulin and C-peptide. We have previously shown that disruption of PC2 (SPC2) expression significantly impairs proinsulin processing. Here we report that disruption of the expression of PC1/3 (SPC3) produces a much more severe block in proinsulin conversion. In nulls, pancreatic and circulating proinsulin-like components comprise 87% and 91%, respectively, of total insulin-related immunoreactivity. Heterozygotes also show a more than 2-fold elevation in proinsulin levels to approximate to12%. Immunocytochemical and ultrastructural studies of the beta cells reveal the nearly complete absence of mature insulin immunoreactivity and its replacement by that of proinsulin in abundant immature-appearing secretory granules. In contrast, alpha cell morphology and glucagon processing are normal, and there is also no defect in somatostatin-14 generation. Pulse-chase labeling studies confirm the existence of a major block in proinsulin processing in PC1/3 nulls with prolongation of half-times of conversion by 7- and 10-fold for proinsulins I and II, respectively. Lack of PC1/3 also results in increased levels of des-64,65 proinsulin intermediates generated by PC2, in contrast to PC2 nulls, in which des-31,32 proinsulin intermediates predominate. These results confirm that PC1/3 plays a major role in processing proinsulin, but that its coordinated action with PC2 is necessary for the most efficient and complete processing of this prohormone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据