4.6 Article

THE ABSENCE OF RADIO EMISSION FROM THE GLOBULAR CLUSTER G1

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 755, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/755/1/L1

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; globular clusters: individual (Mayall-II=G1); X-rays: binaries

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. Ingenuity New Faculty Award
  3. NWO Vidi Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The detections of both X-ray and radio emission from the cluster G1 in M31 have provided strong support for existing dynamical evidence for an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) of mass (1.8 +/- 0.5) x 10(4) M-circle dot at the cluster center. However, given the relatively low significance and astrometric accuracy of the radio detection, and the non-simultaneity of the X-ray and radio measurements, this identification required further confirmation. Here we present deep, high angular resolution, strictly simultaneous X-ray and radio observations of G1. While the X-ray emission (L-X = 1.74(-0.44)(+0.53) x 10(36) (d/750 kpc)(2) erg s(-1) in the 0.5-10 keV band) remained fully consistent with previous observations, we detected no radio emission from the cluster center down to a 3 sigma upper limit of 4.7 mu Jy beam(-1). Our favored explanation for the previous radio detection is flaring activity from a black hole low-mass X-ray binary (LMXB). We performed a new regression of the Fundamental Plane of black hole activity, valid for determining black hole mass from radio and X-ray observations of sub-Eddington black holes, finding log M-BH = (1.638 +/- 0.070) log L-R - (1.136 +/- 0.077) log L-X - (6.863 +/- 0.790), with an empirically determined uncertainty of 0.44 dex. This constrains the mass of the X-ray source in G1, if a black hole, to be <9.7 x 10(3) M-circle dot at 95% confidence, suggesting that it is a persistent LMXB. This annuls what was previously the most convincing evidence from radiation for an IMBH in the Local Group, though the evidence for an IMBH in G1 from velocity dispersion measurements remains unaffected by these results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据