4.6 Article

COMPLEX GAS KINEMATICS IN COMPACT, RAPIDLY ASSEMBLING STAR-FORMING GALAXIES

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 754, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/754/2/L22

关键词

galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: starburst

资金

  1. Spanish MICINN [AYA2010-21887-C04-01, CSD2006-00070]
  2. FCT/MCTES (Portugal)
  3. POPH/FSE (EC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deep, high-resolution spectroscopic observations have been obtained for six compact, strongly star-forming galaxies at redshift z similar to 0.1-0.3, most of them also known as green peas. Remarkably, these galaxies show complex emission-line profiles in the spectral region including Ha, [N II] lambda lambda 6548, 6584, and [S II] lambda lambda 6717, 6731, consisting of the superposition of different kinematical components on a spatial extent of few kiloparsecs: a very broad line emission underlying more than one narrower component. For at least two of the observed galaxies some of these multiple components are resolved spatially in their two-dimensional spectra, whereas for another one a faint detached H alpha blob lacking stellar continuum is detected at the same recessional velocity similar to 7 kpc away from the galaxy. The individual narrower H alpha components show high intrinsic velocity dispersion (sigma similar to 30-80 km s(-1)), suggesting together with unsharped masking Hubble Space Telescope images that star formation proceeds in an ensemble of several compact and turbulent clumps, with relative velocities of up to similar to 500 km s(-1). The broad underlying H alpha components indicate in all cases large expansion velocities (full width zero intensity >= 1000 km s(-1)) and very high luminosities (up to similar to 10(42) erg s(-1)), probably showing the imprint of energetic outflows from supernovae. These intriguing results underline the importance of green peas for studying the assembly of low-mass galaxies near and far.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据