4.8 Article

Development of heart failure and congenital septal defects in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 106, 期 7, 页码 873-879

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000024114.82981.EA

关键词

nitric oxide; heart failure; heart defects, congenital; heart septal defects; apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Nitric oxide (NO) produced by endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) plays an important role in the regulation of cell growth, apoptosis, and tissue perfusion. Recent studies showed that mice deficient in eNOS developed abnormal aortic bicuspid valves. The aim of the present study was to additionally investigate the role of eNOS in heart development. Methods and Results-We examined postnatal mortality, cardiac function, and septum defects in eNOS(-/-), eNOS(+/-), and wild-type mice. Postnatal mortality was significantly increased in eNOS(-/-) (85.1%) and eNOS(+/-) (38.3%) compared with wild-type mice (13.3%, P<0.001). Postmortem examination found severe pulmonary congestion with focal alveolar edema in mice deficient in eNOS. Heart shortening determined by ultrasound crystals was significantly decreased in eNOS(-/-) compared with wild-type mice (P<0.05). Congenital atrial and ventricular septal defects were found in neonatal hearts. The incidence of atrial or ventricular septal defects was significantly increased in eNOS(-/-) (75%) and eNOS(+/-) (32.4%) neonates compared with those of the wild-type mice (4.9%). At embryonic days 12.5 and 15.5, cardiomyocyte apoptosis and myocardial caspase-3 activity were increased in the myocardium of eNOS(-/-)compared with wild-type embryos (P<0.01), and increases in apoptosis persisted to neonatal stage in eNOS(-/-) mice. Conclusions-Deficiency in eNOS results in heart failure and congenital septal defects during cardiac development, which is associated with increases in cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Our data demonstrate that eNOS plays an important role in normal heart development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据