4.6 Article

A COMPTON-THICK ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS AT z ∼ 5 IN THE 4 Ms CHANDRA DEEP FIELD SOUTH

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 730, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/730/2/L28

关键词

galaxies: active; galaxies: high-redshift; X-rays: galaxies

资金

  1. Italian Space Agency (ASI) under the ASI-INAF [I/009/10/0, I/088/06/0]
  2. NASA [SP1-12007A, NNX10AC99G]
  3. Chandra archival grant [SP89004X]
  4. DFG cluster of excellence Origin and Structure of the Universe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the discovery of a Compton-thick active galactic nucleus (AGN) at z = 4.76 in the 4 Ms Chandra Deep Field South. This object was selected as a V-band dropout in HST/ACS images and previously recognized as an AGN from optical spectroscopy. The 4Ms Chandra observations show a significant (similar to 4.2 sigma) X-ray detection at the V-band dropout position. The X-ray source displays a hardness ratio of HR = 0.23 +/- 0.24, which, for a source at z similar to 5, is highly suggestive of Compton-thick absorption. The source X-ray spectrum is seen above the background level in the energy range of similar to 0.9-4 keV, i.e., in the rest-frame energy range of similar to 5-23 keV. When fixing the photon index to Gamma = 1.8, the measured column density is N-H = 1.4(-0.5)(+0.9) x 10(24) cm(-2), which is Compton thick. To our knowledge, this is the most distant heavily obscured AGN, confirmed by X-ray spectral analysis, discovered so far. The intrinsic (de-absorbed), rest-frame luminosity in the 2-10 keV band is similar to 2.5 x 10(44) erg s(-1), which places this object among type-2 quasars. The spectral energy distribution shows that massive star formation is associated with obscured black hole (BH) accretion. This system may have then been caught during a major coeval episode of BH and stellar mass assembly at early times. The measure of the number density of heavily obscured AGN at high redshifts will be crucial to reconstructing the BH/galaxy evolution history from the beginning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据