4.6 Article

THE HIGH ALBEDO OF THE HOT JUPITER KEPLER-7 b

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 735, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/735/1/L12

关键词

planetary systems; stars: individual (Kepler-7, KIC 5780885, 2MASS 19141956+4105233); techniques: photometric

资金

  1. Swiss NSF
  2. NASA [NNX10AD67G]
  3. NASA's Science Mission Directorate
  4. NASA [NNX10AD67G, 135687] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hot Jupiters are expected to be dark from both observations (albedo upper limits) and theory (alkali metals and/or TiO and VO absorption). However, only a handful of hot Jupiters have been observed with high enough photometric precision at visible wavelengths to investigate these expectations. The NASA Kepler mission provides a means to widen the sample and to assess the extent to which hot Jupiter albedos are low. We present a global analysis of Kepler-7 b based on Q0-Q4 data, published radial velocities, and asteroseismology constraints. We measure an occultation depth in the Kepler bandpass of 44 +/- 5 ppm. If directly related to the albedo, this translates to a Kepler geometric albedo of 0.32 +/- 0.03, the most precise value measured so far for an exoplanet. We also characterize the planetary orbital phase light curve with an amplitude of 42 +/- 4 ppm. Using atmospheric models, we find it unlikely that the high albedo is due to a dominant thermal component and propose two solutions to explain the observed planetary flux. First, we interpret the Kepler-7 b albedo as resulting from an excess reflection over what can be explained solely by Rayleigh scattering, along with a nominal thermal component. This excess reflection might indicate the presence of a cloud or haze layer in the atmosphere, motivating new modeling and observational efforts. Alternatively, the albedo can be explained by Rayleigh scattering alone if Na and K are depleted in the atmosphere by a factor of 10-100 below solar abundances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据