4.6 Article

Physical activity changes the regulation of mitochondrial respiration in human skeletal muscle

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 543, 期 1, 页码 191-200

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.019661

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the importance of creatine kinase (CK) in the regulation of muscle mitochondrial respiration in human subjects depending on their level of physical activity. Volunteers were classified as sedentary, active or athletic according to the total activity index as determined by the Baecke questionnaire in combination with maximal oxygen uptake values (peak Vo(2), expressed in ml min(-1) kg(-1)). All volunteers underwent a cyclo-ergometric incremental exercise test to estimate their peak V-O2, and V-O2, at the ventilatory threshold (VT). Muscle biopsy samples were taken from the vastus lateralis and mitochondrial respiration was evaluated in an oxygraph cell on saponin permeabilised muscle fibres in the absence (saponin permeabilised muscle fibres in the absence (V-0) or in the presence (V-max) of saturating [ADP]. While V-0 was similar, V-max differed among groups (sedentary, 3.7 +/- 0.3, active, 5.9 +/- 0.9 and athletic, 7.9 +/- 0.5 mumol O(2)min(-1) (g dry weight)(-1)). V-max was correlated with peak V-O2 (P < 0.01, r = 0.63) and with C, (P < 0.01, r = 0.57). There was a significantly greater degree of coupling between oxidation and phosphorylation (Vmax/V-0) in the athletic individuals. The mitochondrial K-m for ADP was significantly higher in athletic subjects (P < 0.01). Mitochondrial CK (mi-CK) activation by addition of creatine induced a marked decrease in K. in athletic individuals only, indicative of an efficient coupling of mi-CK to ADP rephosphorylation in the athletic subjects only. It is suggested that increasing aerobic performance requires an enhancement of both muscle oxidative capacity and mechanisms of respiratory control, attesting to the importance of temporal co-ordination of energy fluxes by CK for higher efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据