4.6 Article

Localization of the lectin, ERp57 binding, and polypeptide binding sites of calnexin and calreticulin

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 277, 期 33, 页码 29686-29697

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M202405200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calnexin and calreticulin are membrane-bound and soluble chaperones, respectively, of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) which interact transiently with a broad spectrum of newly synthesized glycoproteins. In addition to sharing substantial sequence identity, both calnexin and calreticulin bind to monoglucosylated oligosaccharides of the form Glc(1)Man(5-9)GleNAc(2), interact with the thiol oxidoreductase, ERp57, and are capable of acting as chaperones in vitro to suppress the aggregation of non-native proteins. To understand how these diverse functions are coordinated, we have localized the lectin, ERp57 binding, and polypeptide binding sites of calnexin and calreticulin. Recent structural studies suggest that both proteins consist of a globular domain and an extended arm domain comprised of two sequence motifs repeated in tandem. Our results indicate that the primary lectin site of calnexin and calreticulin resides within the globular domain, but the results also point to a much weaker secondary site within the arm domain which lacks specificity for monoglucosylated oligosaccharides. For both proteins, a site of interaction with ERp57 is centered on the arm domain, which retains similar to50% of binding compared with full-length controls. This site is in addition to a Zn2+-dependent site located within the globular domain of both proteins. Finally, calnexin and calreticulin suppress the aggregation of unfolded proteins via a polypeptide binding site located within their globular domains but require the arm domain for full chaperone function. These findings are integrated into a model that describes the interaction of glycoprotein folding intermediates with calnexin and calreticulin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据