4.6 Article

ONE MOMENT IN TIME-MODELING STAR FORMATION IN THE ANTENNAE

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 715, 期 2, 页码 L88-L93

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/715/2/L88

关键词

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: individual (NGC 4038/39); galaxies: interactions; galaxies: star formation; methods: numerical

资金

  1. DFG [1177]
  2. DFG Cluster of Excellence Origin and Structure of the Universe
  3. STFC [ST/G00269X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G00269X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a new high-resolution N-body/smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulation of an encounter of two gas-rich disk galaxies that closely matches the morphology and kinematics of the interacting Antennae galaxies (NGC 4038/39). The simulation includes radiative cooling, star formation, and feedback from Type II supernovae. The large-scale morphology and kinematics are determined by the internal structure and the orbit of the progenitor disks. The properties of the central region, in particular the starburst in the overlap region, only match the observations for a very short time interval (Delta t approximate to 20 Myr) after the second encounter. This indicates that the Antennae galaxies are in a special phase only about 40 Myr after the second encounter and 50 Myr before their final collision. This is the only phase in the simulation when a gas-rich overlap region between the nuclei is forming accompanied by enhanced star formation. The star formation rate as well as the recent star formation history in the central region agree well with observational estimates. For the first time, this new model explains the distributed extra-nuclear star formation in the Antennae galaxies as a consequence of the recent second encounter. The proposed model predicts that the Antennae are in a later merger stage than the Mice (NGC 4676) and would therefore lose their first place in the classical Toomre sequence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据