4.6 Article

LOWERING THE CHARACTERISTIC MASS OF CLUSTER STARS BY MAGNETIC FIELDS AND OUTFLOW FEEDBACK

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 720, 期 1, 页码 L26-L30

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/L26

关键词

ISM: clouds; ISM: magnetic fields; magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)

资金

  1. NASA [NNG06GJ33G, NNX10AH30G]
  2. [20540228]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20540228] Funding Source: KAKEN
  4. NASA [133406, NNX10AH30G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic fields are generally expected to increase the characteristic mass of stars formed in stellar clusters, because they tend to increase the effective Jeans mass. We test this expectation using adaptive mesh refinement magnetohydrodynamical simulations of cluster formation in turbulent magnetized clumps of molecular clouds, treating stars as accreting sink particles. We find that, contrary to the common expectation, a magnetic field of the strength in the observed range decreases, rather than increases, the characteristic stellar mass. It (1) reduces the number of intermediate-mass stars that are formed through direct turbulent compression, because sub-regions of the clump with masses comparable to those of stars are typically magnetically subcritical and cannot be compressed directly into collapse, and (2) increases the number of low-mass stars that are produced from the fragmentation of dense filaments. The filaments result from mass accumulation along the field lines. In order to become magnetically supercritical and fragment, the filament must accumulate a large enough column density (proportional to the field strength), which yields a high volume density (and thus a small thermal Jeans mass) that is conducive to forming low-mass stars. We find, in addition, that the characteristic stellar mass is reduced further by outflow feedback. The conclusion is that both magnetic fields and outflow feedback are important in shaping the stellar initial mass function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据