4.6 Article

GIANT PLANET FORMATION BY DISK INSTABILITY: A COMPARISON SIMULATION WITH AN IMPROVED RADIATIVE SCHEME

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 716, 期 2, 页码 L176-L180

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/716/2/L176

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; hydrodynamics; instabilities; planets and satellites: formation; protoplanetary disks

资金

  1. NASA [NNG05GN11G, NNX08AK36G]
  2. Planetary Geology and Geophysics Program [NNX08AU41G]
  3. NASA [100052, NNX08AK36G, NNX08AU41G, 93848] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There has been disagreement about whether cooling in protoplanetary disks can be sufficiently fast to induce the formation of gas giant protoplanets via gravitational instabilities. Simulations by our own group and others indicate that this method of planet formation does not work for disks around young, low-mass stars inside several tens of AU, while simulations by other groups show fragmentation into protoplanetary clumps in this region. To allow direct comparison in hopes of isolating the cause of the differences, we here present a high-resolution three-dimensional hydrodynamics simulation of a protoplanetary disk, where the disk model, initial perturbation, and simulation conditions are essentially identical to those used in a recent set of simulations by Boss in 2007, hereafter B07. As in earlier papers by the same author, B07 purports to show that cooling is fast enough to produce protoplanetary clumps. Here, we evolve the same B07 disk using an improved version of one of our own radiative schemes and find that the disk does not fragment in our code but instead quickly settles into a state with only low amplitude nonaxisymmetric structure, which persists for at least several outer disk rotations. We see no rapid radiative or convective cooling. We conclude that the differences in results are due to different treatments of regions at and above the disk photosphere, and we explain at least one way in which the scheme in B07 may lead to artificially fast cooling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据