4.6 Article

THE MID-INFRARED LUMINOSITIES OF NORMAL GALAXIES OVER COSMIC TIME

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 713, 期 1, 页码 L28-L32

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/713/1/L28

关键词

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: stellar content; infrared: galaxies

资金

  1. NASA [NAG5-7697]
  2. Spitzer [JPL 1277397]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modern population synthesis models estimate that 50% of the rest-frame K-band light is produced by thermally pulsing asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) stars during the first Gyr of a stellar population, with a substantial fraction continuing to be produced by the TP-AGB over a Hubble time. Between 0.2 and 1.5 Gyr, intermediate-mass stars evolve into TP-AGB C stars which, due to significant amounts of circumstellar dust, emit half their energy in the mid-IR. We combine these results using published mid-IR colors of Galactic TP-AGB M and C stars to construct simple models for exploring the contribution of the TP-AGB to 24 mu m data as a function of stellar population age. We compare these empirical models with an ensemble of galaxies in the Chandra Deep Field South from z = 0 to z = 2, and with high-quality imaging in M81. Within the uncertainties, the TP-AGB appears responsible for a substantial fraction of the mid-IR luminosities of galaxies from z = 0 to z = 2, the maximum redshift to which we can test our hypothesis, while, at the same time, our models reproduce much of the detailed structure observed in mid-IR imaging of M81. The mid-IR is a good diagnostic of star formation over timescales of similar to 1.5 Gyr, but this implies that ongoing star formation rates at z = 1 may be overestimated by factors of similar to 1.5-6, depending on the nature of star formation events. Our results, if confirmed through subsequent work, have strong implications for the star formation rate density of the universe and the growth of stellar mass over time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据