4.6 Article

IDENTIFICATION OF THE LITHIUM DEPLETION BOUNDARY AND AGE OF THE SOUTHERN OPEN CLUSTER BLANCO 1

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 725, 期 2, 页码 L111-L116

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/725/2/L111

关键词

open clusters and associations: general; open clusters and associations: individual (Blanco 1); stars: evolution; stars: fundamental parameters

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [AST-0349075]
  2. STFC [PP/D000955/1, ST/G002355/1, PP/F000057/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G002355/1, PP/D000955/1, PP/F000057/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present results from a spectroscopic study of the very low mass members of the Southern open cluster Blanco 1 using the Gemini-N telescope. We obtained intermediate resolution (R similar to 4400) GMOS spectra for 15 cluster candidate members with I similar to 14-20 mag, and employed a series of membership criteria-proximity to the cluster's sequence in an I/I - K-s color-magnitude diagram (CMD), kinematics agreeing with the cluster systemic motion, magnetic activity as a youth indicator-to classify 10 of these objects as probable cluster members. For these objects, we searched for the presence of the Li I 6708 angstrom feature to identify the lithium depletion boundary (LDB) in Blanco 1. The I/I - K-s CMD shows a clear mass segregation in the Li distribution along the cluster sequence; namely, all higher mass stars are found to be Li poor, while lower mass stars are found to be Li rich. The division between Li-poor and Li-rich (i.e., the LDB) in Blanco 1 is found at I = 18.78 +/- 0.24 and I - K-s = 3.05 +/- 0.10. Using current pre-main-sequence evolutionary models, we determine an LDB age of 132 +/- 24 Myr. Comparing our derived LDB age to upper-main-sequence isochrone ages for Blanco 1, as well as for other open clusters with identified LDBs, we find good chronometric consistency when using stellar evolution models that incorporate a moderate degree of convective core overshoot.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据