4.6 Article

CONFIRMATION OF THE COMPACTNESS OF A z=1.91 QUIESCENT GALAXY WITH HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE'S WIDE FIELD CAMERA 3

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 714, 期 2, 页码 L244-L248

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/714/2/L244

关键词

cosmology: observations; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation

资金

  1. NASA [HST-GO-11563]
  2. ERC [227749]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [227749] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present very deep Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) photometry of a massive, compact galaxy located in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. This quiescent galaxy has a spectroscopic redshift z = 1.91 and has been identified as an extremely compact galaxy by Daddi et al. We use new H-F160W imaging data obtained with Hubble Space Telescope/WFC3 to measure the deconvolved surface brightness profile to H approximate to 28 mag arcsec(-2). We find that the surface brightness profile is well approximated by an n = 3.7 Sersic profile. Our deconvolved profile is constructed by a new technique which corrects the best-fit Sersic profile with the residual of the fit to the observed image. This allows for galaxy profiles which deviate from a Sersic profile. We determine the effective radius of this galaxy: r(e) = 0.42 +/- 0.14 kpc in the observed H-F160W band. We show that this result is robust to deviations from the Sersic model used in the fit. We test the sensitivity of our analysis to faint wings in the profile using simulated galaxy images consisting of a bright compact component and a faint extended component. We find that due to the combination of the WFC3 imaging depth and our method's sensitivity to extended faint emission we can accurately trace the intrinsic surface brightness profile, and that we can therefore confidently rule out the existence of a faint extended envelope around the observed galaxy down to our surface brightness limit. These results confirm that the galaxy lies a factor similar to 10 off from the local mass-size relation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据