4.6 Article

BLACK HOLE FORMATION IN PRIMORDIAL GALAXIES: CHEMICAL AND RADIATIVE CONDITIONS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 712, 期 1, 页码 L69-L72

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/712/1/L69

关键词

atomic processes; cosmology: theory; dark ages, reionization, first stars; molecular processes; stars: Population III

资金

  1. European Community [/FP7/2007-2013/, 229517]
  2. Landesstiftung Baden-Wurttemberg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In massive primordial galaxies, the gas may directly collapse and form a single central massive object if cooling is suppressed. H(2) line cooling can be suppressed in the presence of a strong soft-ultraviolet radiation field, but the role played by other cooling mechanisms is less clear. In optically thin gas, Ly alpha cooling can be very effective, maintaining the gas temperature below 10(4) K over many orders of magnitude in density. However, the large neutral hydrogen column densities present in primordial galaxies render them highly optically thick to Ly alpha photons. In this paper, we examine in detail the effects of the trapping of these Ly alpha photons on the thermal and chemical evolution of the gas. We show that despite the high optical depth in the Lyman series lines, cooling is not strongly suppressed, and proceeds via other atomic hydrogen transitions. At densities larger than similar to 10(9) cm(-3), collisional dissociation of molecular hydrogen becomes the dominant cooling process and decreases the gas temperature to about 5000 K. The gas temperature evolves with density as T proportional to rho(gamma eff-1), with gamma(eff) = 0.97-0.98. The evolution is thus very close to isothermal, and so fragmentation is possible, but unlikely to occur during the initial collapse. However, after the formation of a massive central object, we expect that later-infalling, higher angular momentum material will form an accretion disk that may be unstable to fragmentation, which may give rise to star formation with a top-heavy initial mass function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据