4.5 Article

Molecular oxygen reduction in PEM fuel cells:: Evidence for the simultaneous presence of two active sites in Fe-based catalysts

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 106, 期 34, 页码 8705-8713

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp020267f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three catalysts for the electroreduction of oxygen have been prepared by pyrolyzing between 400 and 1000 degreesC two iron precursors (Fe acetate or Fe porphyrin) adsorbed on a synthetic carbon made from the pyrolysis of PTCDA (perylene tetracarboxylic dianhydride) in a H-2/NH3/Ar atmosphere. One Fe loading (0.2 wt %) has been used for the catalyst made from the salt precursor. Two Fe loadings (0.2 and 2.0 wt %) have been used for the catalyst made from the porphyrin precursor. These three catalysts have been analyzed' by ToF SIMS and RDE (or GDE) in order to find correlations between ions detected by ToF SIMS and the catalytic activity. These correlations provide information about the number and the structure of the catalytic sites, which are active in these materials. By following the variation of FeNxCy+ ions, it is found that (i) two different catalytic sites exist simultaneously in all catalysts made with the Fe salt or the Fe porphyrin; (ii) one site, named FeNx/C-y(+) is at the origin of three families of FeNxCy+ ions: FeN4Cy+, FeN3Cy+, and FeN1Cy+. The most representative ion of that site is FeN4C8+. The other site, labeled FeN2/C, is at the origin of the. family of FeN2Cy+ ions. The most representative ion of that site is FeN2C4+; (iii) the abundance of FeN2/C goes through a maximum for catalysts pyrolyzed between 700 and 900 degreesC. When Fe acetate is the Fe precursor, FeN2/C may represent up to 80% of the catalytic sites, while this falls to a maximum of about 50% when Fe porphyrin is the precursor; (iv) FeN2/C is more electrocatalytically active than FeN4/C; (v) at high porphyrin loading (2.0 wt % Fe), the catalytic sites bound to the carbon support are covered with a porous layer of pyrolyzed Fe porphyrin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据