4.7 Article

ON THE EVOLUTION OF THE DENSITY PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION IN STRONGLY SELF-GRAVITATING SYSTEMS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 781, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/781/2/91

关键词

galaxies: star formation; gravitation; ISM: clouds

资金

  1. DFG [1573]
  2. Marie Curie Research Training Network [MRTN-CT2006-035890]
  3. STFC rolling grant [PP/E000967/1]
  4. International Max Planck Research School for Astronomy and Cosmic Physics (IMPRS)
  5. Heidelberg Graduate School of Fundamental Physics (HGSFP)
  6. Excellence Initiative of the German Research Foundation DFG [GSC 129/1]
  7. Baden-Wiirttemberg-Stiftung [P-LS-SPII/18]
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB 881]
  9. [SPP 1573]
  10. [KL 1358/14-1]
  11. STFC [PP/E000967/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The time evolution of the probability density function (PDF) of the mass density is formulated and solved for systems in free-fall using a simple approximate function for the collapse of a sphere. We demonstrate that a pressure-free collapse results in a power-law tail on the high-density side of the PDF. The slope quickly asymptotes to the functional form P-V(rho) proportional to rho(-1.54) for the (volume-weighted) PDF and P-M(rho) proportional to rho(-1.54) for the corresponding mass-weighted distribution. From the simple approximation of the PDF we derive analytic descriptions for mass accretion, finding that dynamically quiet systems with narrow density PDFs lead to retarded star formation and low star formation rates (SFRs). Conversely, strong turbulent motions that broaden the PDF accelerate the collapse causing a bursting mode of star formation. Finally, we compare our theoretical work with observations. The measured SFRs are consistent with our model during the early phases of the collapse. Comparison of observed column density PDFs with those derived from our model suggests that observed star-forming cores are roughly in free-fall.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据