4.2 Article

Nitric oxide synthase inhibition speeds oxygen uptake kinetics in horses during moderate domain running

期刊

RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 132, 期 2, 页码 169-178

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1569-9048(02)00068-X

关键词

exercise, O-2 uptake kinetics; gas exchange, pulmonary exercise; mammals, horse; oxygen, uptake kinetics, oxidative machinery; pharmacological agents, L-NAME

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-50306] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Within the moderate exercise intensity domain, the speed of oxygen uptake ((V) over circle (O2)) kinetics at the transition to a higher metabolic rate is thought to be limited by an inertia of the oxidative machinery. Nitric oxide (NO)-induced inhibition of O-2 consumption within the electron transport chain may contribute to this inertia. This investigation tested the hypothesis that a reduction or removal of any such NO effect via infusion of N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; a NOS inhibitor) would speed (V) over circle (O2) kinetics at the onset of moderate exercise. Five Thoroughbred geldings underwent four transitions to running speeds of 7 m sec (-1) (two control, C, 2 L-NAME [20 mg kg(-1)]) on an equine treadmill during which pulmonary gas exchange was determined using a bias flow system. Consistent with exercise in the moderate intensity domain, in none of the transitions was a (V) over circle (O2) slow component elicited. The L-NAME treatment significantly accelerated (V) over circle (O2) kinetics via a reduction of the primary amplitude time constant (C, 17.3 +/- 1.7; L-NAME, 11.8 +/- 1.5 sec, P < 0.05) concomitant with faster overall dynamics (i.e. T-50 and T-75 both P < 0.05) and a trend toward a decreased O-2 deficit (C, 6.4 +/- 0.7; L-NAME, 4.7 1.2 L; P=0.06). These data support the notion that NO contributes prominently to the oxidative enzyme inertia and thus the speed of (V) over circle (O2) kinetics at the onset of moderate intensity exercise in the horse. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据