4.6 Article

Xenopus ribosomal RNA gene Intergenic Spacer elements conferring transcriptional enhancement and nucleolar dominance-like competition in oocytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 277, 期 35, 页码 31577-31584

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M202737200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01-GM60380, R01-GM50910] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Repeated within the intergenic spacers that separate adjacent ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes in Xenopus laevis are several distinct sequence elements. These include transcription terminators, region 0 repeats, region 1 repeats, duplicated spacer promoters, and 42-bp enhancer elements that are embedded within 60 or 81-bp repeats. All have been reported to stimulate RNA polymerase I transcription from an adjacent gene promoter. A greater number of 42-bp enhancers/gene have been suggested to explain the preferential transcription of X. laevis rRNA genes in X. laevis x Xenopus borealis hybrids, an epigenetic phenomenon known as nucleolar dominance. However, the possible contribution of regions 0/1 and/or spacer promoters to the preferential transcription of X. laevis (over X. borealis) rRNA genes has never been tested directly. In this study, we systematically tested the various intergenic spacer elements for their contributions to promoter strength and nucleolar dominance-like competition in oocytes. In disagreement with a previous report, region 0 and region 1 repeats do not have significant enhancer activity, nor do they play a discernible role in X. laevis-X. borealis rRNA gene competition. Minigenes containing X. laevis spacer sequences are only dominant over minigenes having complete X. borealis spacers if a spacer promoter is located upstream of the 42-bp enhancers; X. laevis enhancers alone are not sufficient. These results provide additional evidence that spacer promoters together with adjacent enhancers form a functional activating unit in Xenopus oocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据