4.7 Article

A LARGE CATALOG OF ACCURATE DISTANCES TO MOLECULAR CLOUDS FROM PS1 PHOTOMETRY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 786, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/29

关键词

dust, extinction; ISM: clouds

资金

  1. DFG [SFB 881]
  2. NSF [AST-1312891]
  3. CNRS [PICS06183]
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX08AR22G]
  5. National Science Foundation [AST-1238877]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1009749] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1008342, 1238877] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Distance measurements to molecular clouds are important but are often made separately for each cloud of interest, employing very different data and techniques. We present a large, homogeneous catalog of distances to molecular clouds, most of which are of unprecedented accuracy. We determine distances using optical photometry of stars along lines of sight toward these clouds, obtained from PanSTARRS-1. We simultaneously infer the reddenings and distances to these stars, tracking the full probability distribution function using a technique presented in Green et al. We fit these star-by-star measurements using a simple dust screen model to find the distance to each cloud. We thus estimate the distances to almost all of the clouds in the Magnani et al. catalog, as well as many other well-studied clouds, including Orion, Perseus, Taurus, Cepheus, Polaris, California, and Monoceros R2, avoiding only the inner Galaxy. Typical statistical uncertainties in the distances are 5%, though the systematic uncertainty stemming from the quality of our stellar models is about 10%. The resulting catalog is the largest catalog of accurate, directly measured distances to molecular clouds. Our distance estimates are generally consistent with available distance estimates from the literature, though in some cases the literature estimates are off by a factor of more than two.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据