4.5 Article

Infliximab for treatment of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 34, 期 9, 页码 631-634

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1590-8658(02)80205-5

关键词

immunosuppressive treatments; inflammatory bowel disease; infliximab; ulcerative colitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Success achieved in two subtypes of Crohn's disease has persuaded a few investigators to experiment the monoclonal anti-tumour necrosis factor antibody infliximab in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. So far however the results (achieved in some 30 steroid-refractory patients included in two independent full-papers) indicate a rate of initial response of 50% and of remission of 25%. Aims. To analyse data of an open trial conducted on consecutive steroid-refractory severely ill patients admitted to our referral Unit. Patients and Methods. In 9 months, infliximab was given to 8 patients (4 male, 4 female aged 20-60 years) with uncontrolled ulcerative colitis of whom 6 were non-responders to parenteral steroids. All received the first infliximab dose as an intravenous infusion of 5 mg/kg. Results. Of the 8, 4 (5096) did not respond to the first injection and were submitted to urgent colectomy; the other four responded clinically. Two have maintained clinical remission for 7 months, without the need for steroids; both have received daily azathioprine at 2 mg/kg, and only one has received two further infliximab injections. Of the other two, one received a second injection at week 5, despite this relapsed, and underwent elective colectomy at that time; the other relapsed at 6 months and showed a partial response to a repeat infliximab infusion. Thus, the rate of sustained response is 2/8 (25%) in this study. Conclusion. These results, achieved in an open uncontrolled fashion, seem to reflect those of other independent studies. In our opinion, these findings warrant an in-depth reappraisal of the indication to, use infliximab as rescue treatment for refractory ulcerative colitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据