4.5 Article

Secretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 by endothelial cells of the bovine corpus luteum:: Regulation by cytokines but not prostaglandin F2α

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 143, 期 9, 页码 3582-3589

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2002-220388

关键词

-

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01-HD-35934] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Information regarding the regulation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in regression of the corpus luteum (CL) is limited. This study tested the hypothesis that endothelial cells derived from bovine CL are a source of MCP-1, and that proinflammatory cytokines, prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha), and progesterone regulate MCP-1 expression. Endothelial cells were treated without (Control) or with PGF2alpha (1 muM), TNFalpha (100 ng/ml), interferon-gamma (IFNgamma, 200 IU/ml), and TNFalpha + IFNgamma for 24 and 48 h in the absence or presence of progesterone (P4, 250 ng/ml). Increases in MCP-1 mRNA and protein were observed in response to TNFalpha within 24 and 48 h of culture, respectively (P < 0.05). Interferon-gamma stimulated (P < 0.05) both MCP-1 mRNA and protein after 24 h of culture, and this effect was also sustained through 48 h of culture (P 0.05). Cotreatment of cultures with TNFalpha + IFNgamma lead to further increases (P < 0.05) in MCP-1 in both 24- and 48-h cultures. Surprisingly, neither PGF2alpha nor P4 affected MCP-1 production. Subsequent experiments revealed that the endothelial cells lacked prostaglandin F2alpha receptor mRNA, and the MAPK pathway, although present and responsive to growth factor stimulation, was unresponsive to PGF2alpha stimulation. In summary, endothelial cells derived from bovine CL respond to TNFalpha and IFNgamma stimulation with an increase in MCP-1 secretion. In contrast, neither PGF2alpha nor P4 directly influenced endothelial expression of MCP-1. These results suggest that cytokines stimulate the synthesis of MCP-1 observed during PGF2alpha-induced luteal regression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据