4.7 Article

THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY SIZE AND MORPHOLOGY AT z ∼ 0.5-3.0 IN THE GOODS-N REGION WITH HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE/WFC3 DATA

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 785, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/18

关键词

galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: structure

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [14J03871, 23740152] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyze the recently released Hubble Space Telescope/Wide Field Camera 3 IR images in the GOODS-N region to study the formation and evolution of quiescent galaxies (QGs). After examining the reliability of two-dimensional light profiles with artificial galaxies, we obtain the morphological parameters with Sersic profile of 299 QGs and 1083 star-forming galaxies (SFGs) at z similar to 0.5-3.0, finding the evolution of r(e) and n of massive (M-* >= 10(10.5) M-circle dot) QGs and weaker evolution of SFGs and less massive (M-* < 10(10.5) M-circle dot) QGs. The regression of the size evolution of massive QGs follows r(e) alpha (1 + z)(-alpha re) with alpha(re) = 1.06 +/- 0.19 (a factor of similar to 2.2 increases from z similar to 2.5 to similar to 0.5), which is consistent with the general picture of the significant size growth. For the further understanding of the evolution scenario, we study the evolution of the Sersic index, n, and find that massive QGs significantly evolve as n alpha (1 + z)(-alpha n) with alpha(n) = 0.74 +/- 0.23 (n similar to 1 at z similar to 2.5 to n similar to 4 at z similar to 0.5), while those of the other populations are unchanged (n similar to 1) over the redshift range. The results in the present study are consistent with both observations and numerical simulations where a gas-poor minor merger is believed to be the main evolution scenario. By taking the connection with less massive QGs and SFGs into account, we discuss the formation and evolution of the massive QGs over Cosmic High Noon, or the peak of star-formation in the universe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据