4.7 Article

X-RAY EMISSION FROM ETA CARINAE NEAR PERIASTRON IN 2009. I. A TWO-STATE SOLUTION

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 784, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/2/125

关键词

binaries: general; stars: early-type; stars: individual (Eta Carinae); stars: winds; outflows X-rays: stars

资金

  1. NASA's Astrobiology Institute [RTOP 344-53-51]
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000628/1, ST/I001557/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. STFC [ST/I001557/1, ST/L000628/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

X-ray emission from the supermassive binary system. Car declines sharply around periastron. This X-ray minimum has two distinct phases-the lowest flux phase in the first similar to 3 weeks and a brighter phase thereafter. In 2009, the Chandra X-ray Observatory monitored the first phase five times and found the lowest observed flux at similar to 1.9 x 10(-12) erg cm(-2) s(-1) (3-8 keV). The spectral shape changed such that the hard band above similar to 4 keV dropped quickly at the beginning and the soft band flux gradually decreased to its lowest observed value in similar to 2 weeks. The hard band spectrum had begun to recover by that time. This spectral variation suggests that the shocked gas producing the hottest X-ray gas near the apex of the wind-wind collision (WWC) is blocked behind the dense inner wind of the primary star, which later occults slightly cooler gas downstream. Shocked gas previously produced by the system at earlier orbital phases is suggested to produce the faint residual X-ray emission seen when the emission near the apex is completely blocked by the primary wind. The brighter phase is probably caused by the re-appearance of the WWC plasma, whose emissivity significantly declined during the occultation. We interpret this to mean that the X-ray minimum is produced by a hybrid mechanism of an occultation and a decline in the emissivity of the WWC shock. We constrain timings of superior conjunction and periastron based on these results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据