4.7 Article

CARBON-ENHANCED METAL-POOR STARS: CEMP-s and CEMP-no SUBCLASSES IN THE HALO SYSTEM OF THE MILKY WAY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 788, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/180

关键词

Galaxy: evolution; Galaxy: formation; Galaxy: halo; Galaxy: structure; stars: abundances; surveys

资金

  1. Physics Frontier Center/Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics (JINA) [PHY 08-22648]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation
  3. Gemini Observatory
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Physics [1430152] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We explore the kinematics and orbital properties of a sample of 323 very metal-poor stars in the halo system of the Milky Way, selected from the high-resolution spectroscopic follow-up studies of Aoki et al. and Yong et al. The combined sample contains a significant fraction of carbon-enhanced metal-poor (CEMP) stars (22% or 29%, depending on whether a strict or relaxed criterion is applied for this definition). Barium abundances (or upper limits) are available for the great majority of the CEMP stars, allowing for their separation into the CEMP-s and CEMP-no subclasses. A new method to assign membership to the inner-and outer-halo populations of the Milky Way is developed, making use of the integrals of motion, and applied to determine the relative fractions of CEMP stars in these two subclasses for each halo component. Although limited by small-number statistics, the data suggest that the inner halo of the Milky Way exhibits a somewhat higher relative number of CEMP-s stars than CEMP-no stars (57% versus 43%), while the outer halo possesses a clearly higher fraction of CEMP-no stars than CEMP-s stars (70% versus 30%). Although larger samples of CEMP stars with known Ba abundances are required, this result suggests that the dominant progenitors of CEMP stars in the two halo components were different; massive stars for the outer halo, and intermediate-mass stars in the case of the inner halo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据