4.5 Article

Effect of P-glycoprotein on the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of enaminone anticonvulsants: Analysis by population and physiological approaches

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.102.035436

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 08244-08] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multidrug resistance (MDR), mediated by P-glycoprotein (Pgp) has been identified as altering the disposition of structurally diverse compounds. Previous in vitro studies in bovine brain microvascular endothelial cells and MCF/Adr [Adriamycin (doxorubicin)-resistant human breast cancer] cells displayed that the transport of enaminone anticonvulsants was influenced by Pgp. Therefore the objectives of this study was to further evaluate the influence of Pgp on the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of the enaminone analogs. mdr1ab (+/+) and mdr1ab (-/-) male mice (20 +/- 5 g) were administered DM5 (methyl 4-[(4'-chlorophenyl) amino]-6-methyl-2-oxo-3-cyclohexene-1-carboxylate) or DM44 (12.5 mg/kg, i.v.). Cohorts (n = 3) were sacrificed over a 12-h period, and samples were analyzed by a validated UV-high performance liquid chromatography assay method. Population analysis was used to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters and partition coefficients were determined for tissues. The clearance (0.51 versus 0.33 l/h/kg) and V-d (1.25 versus 0.93 l/ kg) of DM5 were found to be higher (p < 0.05), however the area under the curve (26.1 versus 38.2 μg/ ml . h) was lower (p < 0.05) in mdr1a/1b (-/-) versus mdr1a/1b (+/+) mice, respectively. Similar findings were observed for DM44. Tissues known to express Pgp such as the heart, liver, lung, and brain displayed 2-fold or higher tissue levels in mdr1a/1b (-/-) versus mdr1a/1b (+/+) mice. These results strongly suggest that Pgp may influence enaminone tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics and may play a significant role in the effective treatment of epilepsy with these analogs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据