4.7 Article

THE CARNEGIE SUPERNOVA PROJECT: INTRINSIC COLORS OF TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 789, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/32

关键词

distance scale; dust, extinction; galaxies: ISM; methods: statistical; supernovae: general

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [AST0306969, AST0607438, AST1008343]
  2. Danish Agency for Science and Technology and Innovation
  3. Ahmanson Foundation
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1008343] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an updated analysis of the intrinsic colors of Type Ia supernova (SNe Ia) using the latest data release of the Carnegie Supernova Project. We introduce a new light-curve parameter very similar to stretch that is better suited for fast-declining events, and find that these peculiar types can be seen as extensions to the population of normal SNe Ia. With a larger number of objects, an updated fit to the Lira relation is presented along with evidence for a dependence on the late-time slope of the B - V light-curves with stretch and color. Using the full wavelength range from u to H band, we place constraints on the reddening law for the sample as a whole and also for individual events/hosts based solely on the observed colors. The photometric data continue to favor low values of R-V, though with large variations from event to event, indicating an intrinsic distribution. We confirm the findings of other groups that there appears to be a correlation between the derived reddening law, R-V, and the color excess, E(B - V), such that larger E(B - V) tends to favor lower R-V. The intrinsic u-band colors show a relatively large scatter that cannot be explained by variations in R-V or by the Goobar power-law for circumstellar dust, but rather is correlated with spectroscopic features of the supernova and is therefore likely due to metallicity effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据