4.5 Article

Identification and functional characterization of nadrin variants, a novel family of GTPase activating protein for rho GTPases

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 82, 期 5, 页码 1018-1028

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01021.x

关键词

actin cytoskeleton; GTPase activating protein; neural differentiation; nuclear localization; PC12; Rho

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nadrin is a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for the rho family of GTPases that controls Ca2+-dependent exocytosis in nerve endings. In this study, three novel splice variants of nadrin were identified and the variants were designated as nadrin-102, -104, -116 and -126 according to their relative molecular masses. All nadrin variants share the GAP domain, coiled-coil domain, serine/threonine/proline-rich domain, SH3-binding motif, and a successive repeat of 29 glutamines. Tissue distribution analyses using polyclonal antibodies that can discriminate each variant showed that the expression of nadrin-102, -104 and -116 was dominant in neuronal tissues and correlates well with the differentiation of neurons while nadrin-126 was strongly expressed in embryonic brain. Expression of nadrin-116 in PC12 cells strongly inhibited NGF-dependent neurite outgrowth and this effect was dependent on its GAP activity. In contrast, no significant effect on either cell morphology or neurite outgrowth was observed with other variants. All variants showed punctate appearance throughout the cytoplasm, while the 66-kDa carboxyl-terminal fragment of nadrin-102 and/or nadrin-116 was localized to the nucleus and its nuclear translocation was accelerated by NGF-induced differentiation of the cells. These results suggested that nadrin variants are different in their ability to regulate rho-mediated signaling and that, in addition to being aGTPase-activating protein, nadrin-102 and -116 have otherdistinct functions in the nucleus of the cell, implying apossible role in the cross-talk between the cytoskeleton andthe nucleus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据