4.7 Article

TRANSFORMATION OF A VIRGO CLUSTER DWARF IRREGULAR GALAXY BY RAM PRESSURE STRIPPING: IC3418 AND ITS FIREBALLS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 780, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/119

关键词

galaxies: clusters: individual (Virgo); galaxies: evolution; galaxies: interactions; galaxies: ISM

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [M100031203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present optical imaging and spectroscopy and Hi imaging of the Virgo Cluster galaxy IC 3418, which is likely a smoking gun example of the transformation of a dwarf irregular into a dwarf elliptical galaxy by ram pressure stripping. IC 3418 has a spectacular 17 kpc length UV-bright tail comprised of knots, head-tail, and linear stellar features. The only Ha emission arises from a few H II regions in the tail, the brightest of which are at the heads of head-tail UV sources whose tails point toward the galaxy (fireballs). Several of the elongated tail sources have Ha peaks outwardly offset by similar to 80-150 pc from the UV peaks, suggesting that gas clumps continue to accelerate through ram pressure, leaving behind streams of newly formed stars which have decoupled from the gas. Absorption line strengths, measured from Keck DEIMOS spectra, together with UV colors, show star formation stopped 300 +/- 100 Myr ago in themain body, and a strong starburst occurred prior to quenching. While neither Ha nor Hi emission are detected in the main body of the galaxy, we have detected 4 x 10(7) M-circle dot of Hi from the tail with the Very Large Array. The velocities of tail H II regions, measured from Keck LRIS spectra, extend only a small fraction of the way to the cluster velocity, suggesting that star formation does not happen in more distant parts of the tail. Stars in the outer tail have velocities exceeding the escape speed, but some in the inner tail should fall back into the galaxy, forming halo streams.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据