4.1 Article

Recombination between homologous autosomes in medfly (Ceratitis capitata) males:: type-1 recombination and the implications for the stability of genetic sexing strains

期刊

GENETICA
卷 116, 期 1, 页码 73-84

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020911725724

关键词

Ceratitis capitata; genetic sexing; male recombination; medfly; sterile insect technique; Y-autosome translocations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sterile insect technique (SIT) is an environmentally safe technology to control insect pests. To improve this technology, genetic sexing strains (GSS) have been developed for the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Such strains are based on Y-autosome translocations linking a selectable marker to the male sex and their long-term stability, especially under large-scale mass rearing conditions, is threatened by genetic recombination in the heterozygous males. We have measured male recombination in order to be able to construct GSS that are more stable. Our results show that male recombination occurs at very low frequencies, that is, below 1% per generation. Furthermore, recombination in medfly males occurs premeiotically. By selecting strains where the Y-autosome translocation breakpoint and the selectable marker are closely linked, the deleterious effects of recombination on the stability of GSS can be minimized. In such strains recombination is reduced by ca. 80% as compared to previously studied GSS. Although recombinants still occur at very low frequencies they still pose a threat to the integrity of the sexing system if they possess a selective advantage. Under mass rearing condition such recombinants will accumulate according to their relative fitness and additional measures, such as improved mass rearing strategies, are required to preserve the accuracy of the sexing system. As a conclusion it is shown that current GSS are stable enough to allow mass rearing at levels exceeding 1000 million male medflies per week.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据