4.6 Article

Decreased levels of coenzyme Q10 in patients with bronchial asthma

期刊

ALLERGY
卷 57, 期 9, 页码 811-814

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.23747.x

关键词

alpha-tocopherol; beta-carotene; allergic asthma; coenzyme Q(10); eosinophil cationic protein; malondialdehyde

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The contribution of free oxygen radicals in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma is generally accepted. The modulation of antioxidative defence by supplementation with antioxidants represents additive therapy in complex management of disease. The aim of the study was to assess the levels of coenzyme Q(10), alpha-tocopherol, and beta-carotene both in plasma and whole blood, and malondialdehyde (MDA) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in plasma of asthmatics (As). Methods: Fifty-six As (15 males and 41 females) aged from 19 to 72 years (mean age 46 years) suffering from allergic asthma were enrolled into the study. The control group comprised 25 healthy volunteers (16 males, 9 females) aged 25-50 years. Results: The concentrations of CoQ(10) decreased significantly both in plasma and whole blood, compared with healthy volunteers (0.34 +/- 0.15 mumol/l vs. 0.52 +/- 0.15 mumol/l, 0.33 +/- 0.14 mumol/l vs. 0.50 +/- 0.13 mumol/l, P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively). The levels of alpha-tocopherol were decreased both in plasma and whole blood in comparison with controls [24.10 mumol/l (19.8; 30.5), vs. 33.20 mumol/l (28.25; 38.05), 17.22 +/- 6.45 mumol/l vs. 21.58 +/- 7.92 mumol/l, P=0.006, P=0.01, respectively]. The levels of MDA were elevated over the reference range in both groups (reference range < 4.5 mumol/l). No changes were seen in beta-carotene concentrations. Positive correlation was found between whole blood CoQ(10) and alpha-tocopherol concentrations. Conclusions: Results of the study suggest a possible contribution of suboptimal concentrations of CoQ(10) on antioxidative dysbalance in As and provide a rationale for its supplementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据