4.4 Article

Mild opioid deprivation increases the degree that opioid-dependent outpatients discount delayed heroin and money

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 163, 期 2, 页码 174-182

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-002-1159-2

关键词

delay discounting; heroin addicts; opioid withdrawal; opioid satiation

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [T32DA07242, 1R01DA122997, 1R01DA11692] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: A growing literature suggests that excessive temporal discounting of delayed rewards may be a contributing factor in the etiology of substance abuse problems. Little is known, however, about how drug deprivation may affect temporal discounting of delayed rewards by drug-dependent individuals. Objective: To examine the extent to which opioid deprivation affects how opioid-dependent individuals discount small, medium and large quantities of delayed heroin and money. Methods: Thirteen opioid-dependent individuals maintained on buprenorphine completed a hypothetical choice task in which they choose between a constant delayed reward amount and an immediate reward amount that was adjusted until they expressed indifference between both outcomes. The task was completed for three values of heroin and money rewards during eight sessions under conditions of opioid deprivation (four sessions) and satiation (four sessions). Results: Across conditions, hyperbolic functions provided a good fit for the discounting data. Degree of discounting was significantly higher when subjects were opioid deprived. Consistent with previous Findings, degree of discounting was higher for heroin than money and inversely related to the magnitude of the reward. Conclusion: Opioid deprivation increased the degree to which dependent individuals discounted delayed heroin and money. Understanding the conditions that affect how drug-dependent individuals discount delayed rewards might help us understand the myopic choices made by such individuals and help improve treatment outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据