4.6 Article

Plasma 3-deoxyglucosone elevation in chronic renal failure is associated with increased aldose reductase in erythrocytes

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 464-471

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.34884

关键词

chronic renal failure (CRF); 3-deoxyglucosone (3DG); glycation; aldose reductase (AR); polyol pathway; plasma osmolality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Serum concentrations of 3-deoxyglucosone (3DG), a highly reactive dicarbonyl compound, are elevated in uremic patients. Aldose reductase (AR) is an enzyme involved in both the detoxification of 3DG and producing precursors of 3DG. Methods: We examined the relationship between plasma 3DG and erythrocyte AR content in uremic patients. Patients were divided into three groups: (1) progressive renal disease without hemodialysis (HD; chronic renal failure [CRF] group), (2) patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) treated with maintenance HD (HD group), and (3) patients with DM treated with maintenance HD (DM-HD group). High-performance liquid chromatography was used to measure 3DG, and erythrocyte AR was measured by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: Both 3DG and erythrocyte AR levels were significantly greater in the CRF, HD, and DM-HD groups than in healthy controls. These results did not change after HD sessions in the HD or DM-HD groups. Serum creatinine levels correlated with 3DG and erythrocyte AR levels in the control and CRF groups (3DG: r = 0.67; P < 0.001; erythrocyte AR: r = 0.71; P < 0.001). Both erythrocyte AR and 3DG levels then increased as renal function declined. A positive correlation was seen between 3DG and erythrocyte AR levels in all groups (r = 0.65; P < 0.001), and also between plasma osmolality and erythrocyte AR level (r = 0.46; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Both erythrocyte AR and 3DG levels are increased in uremic patients, and these increases could possibly contribute to the development of uremic symptoms. (C) 2002 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据