4.7 Article

ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI, NEUTRINOS, AND INTERACTING COSMIC RAYS IN NGC 253 AND NGC 1068

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 780, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/137

关键词

cosmic rays; galaxies: individual (NGC 253, NGC 1068); galaxies: starburst; gamma rays: galaxies; radio continuum: galaxies

资金

  1. NSF [AST-0907837, PHY-0821899, PHY-0969061]
  2. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0907837] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Physics
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0821899] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The galaxies M82, NGC 253, NGC 1068, and NGC 4945 have been detected in gamma-rays by Fermi. Previously, we developed and tested a model for cosmic-ray interactions in the starburst galaxy M82. Now, we aim to explore the differences between starburst and active galactic nucleus (AGN) environments by applying our self-consistent model to the starburst galaxy NGC 253 and the Seyfert galaxy NGC 1068. Assuming a constant cosmic-ray acceleration efficiency by supernova remnants with Milky Way parameters, we calculate the cosmic-ray proton and primary and secondary electron/positron populations, predict the radio and gamma-ray spectra, and compare with published measurements. We find that our models easily fit the observed gamma-ray spectrum for NGC 253 while constraining the cosmic-ray source spectral index and acceleration efficiency. However, we encountered difficultly modeling the observed radio data and constraining the speed of the galactic wind and the magnetic field strength, unless the gas mass is less than currently preferred values. Additionally, our starburst model consistently underestimates the observed gamma-ray flux and overestimates the radio flux for NGC 1068; these issues would be resolved if the AGN is the primary source of gamma-rays. We discuss the implications of these results and make predictions for the neutrino fluxes for both galaxies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据