4.7 Article

THE EFFECTS OF CURVATURE AND EXPANSION ON HELIUM DETONATIONS ON WHITE DWARF SURFACES

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 776, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/776/2/97

关键词

binaries: close; nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances; shock waves; supernovae: general; white dwarfs

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [PHY 11-25915, AST 11-09174]
  2. DOE
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1109174] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accreted helium layers on white dwarfs have been highlighted for many decades as a possible site for a detonation triggered by a thermonuclear runaway. In this paper, we find the minimum helium layer thickness that will sustain a steady laterally propagating detonation and show that it depends on the density and composition of the helium layer, specifically C-12 and O-16. Detonations in these thin helium layers have speeds slower than the Chapman-Jouget (CJ) speed from complete helium burning, v(CJ) = 1.5 x 10(9) cm s(-1). Though gravitationally unbound, the ashes still have unburned helium (approximate to 80% in the thinnest cases) and only reach up to heavy elements such as Ca-40, Ti-44, Cr-48, and Fe-52. It is rare for these thin shells to generate large amounts of Ni-56. We also find a new set of solutions that can propagate in even thinner helium layers when O-16 is present at a minimum mass fraction of approximate to 0.07. Driven by energy release from a captures on O-16 and subsequent elements, these slow detonations only create ashes up to Si-28 in the outer detonated He shell. We close by discussing how the unbound helium burning ashes may create faint and fast Ia supernovae as well as events with virtually no radioactivity, and speculate on how the slower helium detonation velocities impact the off-center ignition of a carbon detonation that could cause a Type Ia supernova in the double detonation scenario.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据