4.7 Article

GRAVITATIONAL CONUNDRUM? DYNAMICAL MASS SEGREGATION VERSUS DISRUPTION OF BINARY STARS IN DENSE STELLAR SYSTEMS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 765, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/4

关键词

binaries: general; galaxies: star clusters: individual (NGC 1818); Hertzsprung-Russell and C-M diagrams; Magellanic Clouds; stars: kinematics and dynamics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11073001, 10973015, 11003027, 11173004]
  2. Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation (PPGF)
  3. Peking University One Hundred Talents Fund (985 program)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Upon their formation, dynamically cool (collapsing) star clusters will, within only a few million years, achieve stellar mass segregation for stars down to a few solar masses, simply because of gravitational two-body encounters. Since binary systems are, on average, more massive than single stars, one would expect them to also rapidly mass segregate dynamically. Contrary to these expectations and based on high-resolution Hubble Space Telescope observations, we show that the compact, 15-30 Myr old Large Magellanic Cloud cluster NGC 1818 exhibits tantalizing hints at the >= 2 sigma level of significance (> 3 sigma if we assume a power-law secondary-to-primary mass-ratio distribution) of an increasing fraction of F-star binary systems (with combined masses of 1.3-1.6M(circle dot)) with increasing distance from the cluster center, specifically between the inner 10 ''-20 '' (approximately equivalent to the cluster's core and half-mass radii) and the outer 60 ''-80 ''. If confirmed, then this will offer support for the theoretically predicted but thus far unobserved dynamical disruption processes of the significant population of soft binary systems-with relatively low binding energies compared to the kinetic energy of their stellar members-in star clusters, which we have access to here by virtue of the cluster's unique combination of youth and high stellar density.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据