4.7 Review

Expression of fatty acid binding proteins inhibits lipid accumulation and alters toxicity in L cell fibroblasts

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 283, 期 3, 页码 C688-C703

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00586.2001

关键词

sterol carrier protein-2; sterol carrier protein-x; liver fatty acid binding protein; fatty acids; phytanic acid; palmitic acid; lipid mass; toxicity

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-41402] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM-31651] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High levels of saturated, branched-chain fatty acids are deleterious to cells and animals, resulting in lipid accumulation and cytotoxicity. Although fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs) are thought to be protective, this hypothesis has not previously been examined. Phytanic acid (branched chain, 16-carbon backbone) induced lipid accumulation in L cell fibroblasts similar to that observed with palmitic acid (unbranched, C-16): triacylglycerol >> free fatty acid > cholesterol > cholesteryl ester >> phospholipid. Although expression of sterol carrier protein (SCP)-2, SCP-(X), or liver FABP (L-FABP) in transfected L cells reduced [H-3] phytanic acid uptake (57-87%) and lipid accumulation (21-27%), nevertheless [H-3] phytanic acid oxidation was inhibited (74-100%) and phytanic acid toxicity was enhanced in the order L-FABP >> SCP-(X) > SCP-2. These effects differed markedly from those of [H-3] palmitic acid, whose uptake, oxidation, and induction of lipid accumulation were not reduced by L-FABP, SCP-2, or SCP-(X) expression. Furthermore, these proteins did not enhance the cytotoxicity of palmitic acid. In summary, intracellular FABPs reduce lipid accumulation induced by high levels of branched-chain but not straight-chain saturated fatty acids. These beneficial effects were offset by inhibition of branched-chain fatty acid oxidation that correlated with the enhanced toxicity of high levels of branched-chain fatty acid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据