4.7 Article

Blosynthesis and properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) polymers

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 3, 期 5, 页码 1006-1012

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bm025543a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In support of programs to identify polyhydroxyalkanoates with improved materials properties, we report on our efforts to characterize the mechanical and thermal properties of copolyesters of 3-hydroxybutyrate (3HB) and 3-hydroxyhexanoate (3HHx). The copolyesters, having molar fraction of 3HHx ranging from 2.5 to 35 mol % and average molecular weights ranging from 1.15 x 10(5) to 6.65 x 10(5), were produced by fermentation using Aeromonas hydrophila and a recombinant strain of Pseudomonas putida GPp104. The polymers were chloroform extracted and characterized by solution-state and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and a variety of mechanical and thermal tests. Solution-state H-1 NMR data were used to determine polymer composition-of-matter, while solution-state C-13 NMR data provided polymer-sequence information. Solvent fractionation and NMR spectroscopic characterization of these polymers showed that polymers containing up to 9.5 mol % 3HHx had a Bernoullian compositional distribution. By contrast, polymers containing more than 9.5 mol % 3HHx had a bimodal polymer composition. Solvent fractionation of these 3HHx-rich polyesters produced two polymer fractions, each of which was again consistent with Bernoullian polymerization statistics. Solid-state NMR relaxation experiments provided insight into aging in poly(3HB-co-3HHx) copolymers, demonstrating increased polymer-chain motion with increasing 3HHx content. The elongation-to-break ratio in the polyesters increased with increasing molar fraction of 3HHx monomers. Aging properties of the poly(3HB-co-3HHx) copolymers were very similar to copolymers of 3HB and 3-hydroxyvalerate (3HV). However, poly(3HB-co-3HHx) exhibited increased activation energy to thermal degradation with increasing 3HHx content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据