4.3 Review

Ion channel formation and membrane-linked pathologies of misfolded hydrophobic proteins: The role of dangerous unchaperoned molecules

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2002.03737.x

关键词

amyloid-forming proteins; antimicrobial proteins; ion channel formation; membrane destabilization; membrane-linked pathologies; misfolded hydrophobic proteins; unchaperoned proteins; viral proteins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. Protein-membrane interaction includes the interaction of proteins with intrinsic receptors and ion transport pathways and with membrane lipids. Several hypothetical interaction models have been reported for peptide-induced membrane destabilization, including hydrophobic clustering, electrostatic interaction, electrostatic followed by hydrophobic interaction, wedge x type incorporation and hydrophobic mismatch. 2. The present review focuses on the hypothesis of protein interaction with lipid membranes of those unchaperoned positively charged and misfolded proteins that have hydrophobic regions. We advance the hypothesis that protein misfolding that leads to the exposure of hydrophobic regions of proteins renders them potentially cytotoxic. Such proteins include prion, amyloid beta protein (AbetaP), amylin, calcitonin, serum amyloid and C-type natriuretic peptides. These proteins have the ability to interact with lipid membranes, thereby inducing membrane damage and cell malfunction. 3. We propose that the most significant mechanism of membrane damage induced by hydrophobic misfolded proteins is mediated via the formation of ion channels. The hydrophobicity based toxicity of several proteins linked to neurodegenerative pathologies is similar to those observed for antibacterial toxins and viral proteins. 4. It is hypothesized that the membrane damage induced by amyloids, antibacterial toxins and viral proteins represents a common mechanism for cell malfunction, which underlies the associated pathologies and cytotoxicity of such proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据