4.7 Article

AN OFF-CENTER DENSITY PEAK IN THE MILKY WAY'S DARK MATTER HALO?

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 765, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/10

关键词

dark matter; Galaxy: center; Galaxy: halo; gamma rays: galaxies; methods: numerical

资金

  1. ETH Zurich Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. Marie Curie Actions for People COFUND Program
  3. Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) [s205, s352]
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation [OIA-1124453, OIA-1124403]
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [908910] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Office of Integrative Activities
  8. Office Of The Director [1124453] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We show that the position of the central dark matter (DM) density peak may be expected to differ from the dynamical center of the Galaxy by several hundred parsecs. In Eris, a high-resolution cosmological hydrodynamics simulation of a realistic Milky-Way-analog disk galaxy, this offset is 300-400 pc (similar to 3 gravitational softening lengths) after z = 1. In its dissipationless DM-only twin simulation ErisDark, as well as in the Via Lactea II and GHalo simulations, the offset remains below one softening length for most of its evolution. The growth of the DM offset coincides with a flattening of the central DM density profile in Eris inward of similar to 1 kpc, and the direction from the dynamical center to the point of maximum DM density is correlated with the orientation of the stellar bar, suggesting a bar-halo interaction as a possible explanation. A DM density offset of several hundred parsecs greatly affects expectations of the DM annihilation signals from the Galactic center. It may also support a DM annihilation interpretation of recent reports by Weniger and Su & Finkbeiner of highly significant 130 GeV gamma-ray line emission from a region 1 degrees.5 (similar to 200 pc projected) away from Sgr A* in the Galactic plane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据