4.7 Article

EVIDENCE FOR LOW EXTINCTION IN ACTIVELY STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT z > 6.5

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 752, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/752/2/93

关键词

cosmology: observations; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; infrared: galaxies

资金

  1. INSU/CNRS (France)
  2. MPG (Germany)
  3. IGN (Spain)
  4. DLR [FKZ-50-OR-1104]
  5. Spitzer Space Telescope grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a search for the [C II] 158 mu m fine structure line (a main cooling line of the interstellar medium) and the underlying far-infrared (FIR) continuum in three high-redshift (6.6 < z < 8.2) star-forming galaxies using the IRAM Plateau de Bure Interferometer. We targeted two Ly alpha-selected galaxies (Ly alpha emitters, LAEs) with moderate UV-based star formation rates (SFRs similar to 20 M-circle dot yr(-1); Himiko at z = 6.6 and IOK-1 at z = 7.0) and a gamma-ray burst (GRB) host galaxy (GRB 090423 at z similar to 8.2). Based on our 3 sigma rest-frame FIR continuum limits, previous (rest-frame) UV continuum measurements and spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting, we rule out SED shapes similar to highly obscured galaxies (e.g., Arp 220, M 82) and less extreme dust-rich nearby spiral galaxies (e.g., M 51) for the LAEs. Conservatively assuming an SED shape typical of local spiral galaxies we derive upper limits for the FIR-based star formation rates (SFRs) of similar to 70 M-circle dot yr(-1), similar to 50 M-circle dot yr(-1), and similar to 40 M-circle dot yr(-1) for Himiko, IOK-1, and GRB 090423, respectively. For the LAEs these limits are only a factor similar to 3 higher than the published UV-based SFRs (uncorrected for extinction). This indicates that the dust obscuration in the z > 6 LAEs studied here is lower by a factor of a few than what has recently been found in some LAEs at lower redshift (2 < z < 3.5) with similar UV-based SFRs. A low obscuration in our z > 6 LAE sample is consistent with recent rest-frame UV studies of z similar to 7 Lyman break galaxies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据