4.7 Article

THE ORIGIN OF THE SPLIT RED CLUMP IN THE GALACTIC BULGE OF THE MILKY WAY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 756, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/22

关键词

Galaxy: abundances; Galaxy: bulge; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics; Galaxy: structure; stars: late-type

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. RSAA
  4. Australian Research Council [DP0988751, FT100100268, DP110100678]
  5. European Commission through the DAGAL Network [PITN-GA-2011-289313]
  6. ARC Federation Fellowship
  7. Chilean Centro de Astrofisica FONDAP [15010003]
  8. Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  9. Hungarian OTKA [K76816, MB08C 81013, K83790]
  10. Australian Research Council [DP0988751] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Near the minor axis of the Galactic bulge, at latitudes b < -5 degrees, the red giant clump stars are split into two components along the line of sight. We investigate this split using the three fields from the ARGOS survey that lie on the minor axis at (l, b) = (0 degrees,-5 degrees), (0 degrees,-7 degrees.5), (0 degrees,-10 degrees). The separation is evident for stars with [Fe/H] > -0.5 in the two higher-latitude fields, but not in the field at b = -5 degrees. Stars with [Fe/H] < -0.5 do not show the split. We compare the spatial distribution and kinematics of the clump stars with predictions from an evolutionary N-body model of a bulge that grew from a disk via bar-related instabilities. The density distribution of the peanut-shaped model is depressed near its minor axis. This produces a bimodal distribution of stars along the line of sight through the bulge near its minor axis, very much as seen in our observations. The observed and modeled kinematics of the two groups of stars are also similar. We conclude that the split red clump of the bulge is probably a generic feature of boxy/peanut bulges that grew from disks, and that the disk from which the bulge grew had relatively few stars with [Fe/H] < -0.5.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据