4.7 Article

REVERBERATION MAPPING RESULTS FOR FIVE SEYFERT 1 GALAXIES

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 755, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/755/1/60

关键词

galaxies: active; galaxies: nuclei; galaxies: Seyfert

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [AST-1008882]
  2. NSF [AST-1004756]
  3. Generalitat Valenciana [APOSTD/2010/030]
  4. Technion
  5. Israel-Niedersachsen collaboration program
  6. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
  7. Russian Foundation of Research (RFBR) [09-02-01136a]
  8. US Civilian Research and Development for Independent States of the Former Soviet Union (CRDF) [UP1-2116, UP1-2549-CR-03]
  9. Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports of Japan [17104002, 20041003, 21018003, 21018005, 22253002, 22540247]
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22253002, 22540247, 21018003, 21018005] Funding Source: KAKEN
  11. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  12. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1008882, 1009756] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the results from a detailed analysis of photometric and spectrophotometric data on five Seyfert 1 galaxies observed as a part of a recent reverberation mapping program. The data were collected at several observatories over a 140 day span beginning in 2010 August and ending in 2011 January. We obtained high sampling-rate light curves for Mrk 335, Mrk 1501, 3C 120, Mrk 6, and PG 2130+099, from which we have measured the time lag between variations in the 5100 angstrom continuum and the H beta broad emission line. We then used these measurements to calculate the mass of the supermassive black hole at the center of each of these galaxies. Our new measurements substantially improve previous measurements of M-BH and the size of the broad line-emitting region for four sources and add a measurement for one new object. Our new measurements are consistent with photoionization physics regulating the location of the broad line region in active galactic nuclei.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据