4.3 Article

Differential expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) and VEGF-B after brain injury

期刊

出版社

AMER ASSN NEUROPATHOLOGISTS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnen/61.9.778

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our previous study demonstrated that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), now referred to as VEGF-A, plays a significant role in blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown and angiogenesis after brain injury. In this study, VEGF-A expression was compared with that of VEGF-B in the rat cortical cold injury model over a period of 6 hours to 6 days post-injury. VEGF-A and VEGF-13 mRNA were detected by in situ hybridization and their protein was detected by immunohistochemistry. The presence of VEGF-A and VEGF-13 proteins in endothelium of lesion vessels was related to BBB breakdown by double labeling for either of these growth factors and fibronectin, which was used as a marker of BBB breakdown. Significant induction of both VEGF-A and VEGF-B mRNA occurred at the lesion site during the period of maximal endothelial proliferation. VEGF-A mRNA levels peaked at 3 and 4 days post-injury and returned to basal expression by day 6, while VEGF-B mRNA levels remained elevated up to day 6. VEGF-13 protein was constitutively expressed in endothelium of all cerebral vessels. After brain injury, there was increased immunoreactivity for VEGF-13 at the lesion site, this protein being present in the endothelium and vascular smooth muscle cells of pial vessels, in inflammatory cells, and later in proliferating endothelial cells, endothelium of neovessels, and astrocytes. Lesion vessels showing BBB breakdown to fibronectin showed endothelial VEGF-A protein but not VEGF-B protein. Constitutive expression of VEGF-13 in normal endothelium suggests that it may have a role in maintenance of the BBB in steady states, while its induction at both the gene and protein level post-injury indicates that it has an essential role in angiogenesis and the repair processes after brain injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据