4.7 Article

THE GROWTH OF THE STELLAR SEEDS OF SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 750, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/66

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; cosmology: theory; early universe; galaxies: formation; H II regions; stars: formation

资金

  1. National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy at Los Alamos National Laboratory [DE-AC52-06NA25396]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy through the LANL/LDRD
  3. LANL LDRD at Los Alamos National Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The collapse of baryons into extremely massive stars with masses similar to 10(4) M-circle dot in a small fraction of protogalaxies at z greater than or similar to 10 is a promising candidate for the origin of supermassive black holes (SMBHs), some of which grow to a billion solar masses by z similar to 7. We determine the maximum masses such stars can attain by accreting primordial gas. We find that at relatively low accretion rates the strong ionizing radiation of these stars limits their masses to M-* similar to 10(3) M-circle dot ((M) over dot(acc)/10(-3) M-circle dot yr(-1))(8/7), where (M) over dot(acc) is the rate at which the star gains mass. However, at the higher central infall rates usually found in numerical simulations of protogalactic collapse (>= 0.1 M-circle dot yr(-1)), the lifetime of the star instead limits its final mass to similar to 10(6) M-circle dot. Furthermore, for the spherical accretion rates at which the star can grow, its ionizing radiation is confined deep within the protogalaxy, so the evolution of the star is decoupled from that of its host galaxy. Ly alpha emission from the surrounding H II region is trapped in these heavy accretion flows and likely reprocessed into strong Balmer series emission, which may be observable by the James Webb Space Telescope. This, strong He II lambda 1640, and continuum emission are likely to be the key observational signatures of the progenitors of SMBHs at high redshift.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据