4.7 Article

COMPACT REMNANT MASS FUNCTION: DEPENDENCE ON THE EXPLOSION MECHANISM AND METALLICITY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 749, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/91

关键词

black hole physics; stars: neutron; supernovae: general

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [W-7405-ENG-36]
  2. NASA [SWIF03-0047]
  3. MSHE [N N203 404939]
  4. NSF [AST-0908930]
  5. Aspen Center for Physics
  6. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0908930] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Physics
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1151836] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Division Of Physics
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0969820] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mass distribution of neutron stars and stellar-mass black holes provides vital clues into the nature of stellar core collapse and the physical engine responsible for supernova explosions. A number of supernova engines have been proposed: neutrino- or oscillation-driven explosions enhanced by early (developing in 10-50 ms) and late-time (developing in 200 ms) convection as well as magnetic field engines (in black hole accretion disks or neutron stars). Using our current understanding of supernova engines, we derive mass distributions of stellar compact remnants. We provide analytic prescriptions for both single-star models (as a function of initial star mass) and for binary-star models-prescriptions for compact object masses for major population synthesis codes. These prescriptions have implications for a range of observations: X-ray binary populations, supernova explosion energies, and gravitational wave sources. We show that advanced gravitational radiation detectors (like LIGO/VIRGO or the Einstein Telescope) will be able to further test the supernova explosion engine models once double black hole inspirals are detected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据