4.7 Article

NEW SOLAR WIND DIAGNOSTIC USING BOTH IN SITU AND SPECTROSCOPIC MEASUREMENTS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 750, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/159

关键词

solar wind; Sun: UV radiation

资金

  1. NASA [NNX11AC20G, NNX10AM17G, NNX10AQ58G, NNX08AI11G, NNX07AB99G, NNX10AQ61G]
  2. GRSP [NNX10AM41H]
  3. [SV1-81002]
  4. NASA [129864, NNX10AM17G, 123944, NNX10AQ58G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We develop a new diagnostic technique that utilizes, at the same time, two completely different types of observations-in situ determinations of solar wind charge states and high-resolution spectroscopy of the inner solar corona-in order to study the temperature, density, and velocity of the solar wind as a function of height in the inner corona below the plasma freeze-in point. This technique relies on the ability to calculate the evolution of the ion charge composition as the solar wind escapes the Sun given the wind temperature, density, and velocity profiles as a function of distance. The resulting charge state composition can be used to predict frozen-in charge states as well as spectral line intensities. The predicted spectra and ion charge compositions can be compared with observations carried out when spectrometers and in situ instruments are in quadrature configuration to quantitatively test a set of assumptions regarding density, temperature, and velocity profiles in the low corona. Such a comparison can be used in two ways. If the input profiles are predicted by a theoretical solar wind model, this technique allows the benchmarking of the model. Otherwise, an empirical determination of the velocity, temperature, and density profiles can be achieved below the plasma freeze-in point applying a trial-and-error procedure to initial, user-specified profiles. To demonstrate this methodology, we have applied this technique to a state-of-the-art coronal hole and equatorial streamer model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据