4.7 Article

Long-term treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor improves hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity in the VDF Zucker rat - A euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp study

期刊

DIABETES
卷 51, 期 9, 页码 2677-2683

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.51.9.2677

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Upon release into circulation, the potent insulin secretagogues glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are rapidly cleaved and inactivated by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DP IV). Long-term administration of specific DP IV inhibitors, so as to enhance circulating active GIP and GLP-1 levels, has been shown to improve glucose tolerance and beta-cell glucose responsiveness and to reduce hyperinsulinemia in the Vancouver diabetic fatty (VDF) rat model of type 2 diabetes. Using the VDF model, the current study was undertaken to examine the effects of long-term DP IV inhibitor treatment on insulin sensitivity. Euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamps were performed on two sets of conscious VDF rats treated with or without the DP IV inhibitor P32/98 (20 mg . kg(-1) . day(-1) for 12 weeks). The protocol consisted of three sequential 90-min periods with insulin infusion rates of 0, 5, and 15 mU . kg(-1) . min(-1) and included a constant infusion of [H-3]glucose for measure of hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity. Relative to untreated littermates, the treated animals showed a left shift in the sensitivity of hepatic glucose output to insulin (average reduction similar to 6 mumol . kg(-1) . min(-1)) and a marked gain in peripheral responsiveness to insulin, with glucose disposal rates Increasing 105 and 216% in response to the two insulin steps (versus 2 and 46% in controls). These results provide the first demonstration of improved hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity after DP IV inhibitor therapy, and coupled with apparent improvements in beta-cell function, they offer strong support for the utility of these compounds in the treatment of diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据