4.6 Article

Sepsis-induced depressed contractile function of isolated ventricular myocytes is due to altered calcium transient properties

期刊

SHOCK
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 285-288

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00024382-200209000-00014

关键词

sepsis; ventricular myocytes; contraction; relaxation; intracellular Ca2+ transients

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic peritoneal sepsis in a rodent model produces myocardial dysfunction characterized by decreased rates of ventricular contraction and relaxation in the isolated heart preparation. However, it remains controversial whether the ventricular contractility is altered during sepsis. In the present study, we determined the effect of chronic peritoneal sepsis on the mechanical properties and intracellular Ca2+ handling of cardiac myocytes isolated from septic rats at 24 or 48 h. Mechanical properties were evaluated by use of an lonOptix MyoCam system. Myocytes were electrically stimulated at 0.5 Hz. The contractile properties analyzed included peak shortening (PS), time-to-peak shortening (TPS), time-to-90% relengthening (TR90), and maximal velocities of shortening and relengthening (+/-dL/dt). Intracellular Ca2+ handling was evaluated with fura-2 fluorescent dye. Myocytes obtained from 24-h postseptic animals exhibited a depressed PS (85% of control), normal TPS, prolonged TR90 (147% of control), and reduced +/-dL/dt(both 79% of control). Myocytes from 48-h postseptic animals also exhibited a reduced peak of intracellular Ca2+ sequestration (55% of control), but resting intracellular Ca2+ and Ca2+-transient decay were comparable with the values seen in myocytes from untreated rats. Myocytes from septic and control animals were equally responsive over a range of stimulation frequencies (0.1-5 Hz). Myocytes from septic animals were unresponsive (5% of control) to increase of extracellular Ca2+ (0.5-3 mM). These results demonstrate that sepsis produces substantial deficits in cardiac myocytes function that can be attributed to altered calcium transient properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据